- From: <cyns@opendesign.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:18:43 -0700
- To: lseeman@globalformats.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Short, sweet, and to the point. I like it. -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Seeman [mailto:lseeman@globalformats.com] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 7:11 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: an action item :) In the ftf one of my action items was to write a replacement for the list of impairments catered for in the introduction. The idea is to give people a sense of context about who and what the guidelines are for, some awareness of what user groups and devices exist, without opening a Pandora's box of classifying disabilities (which I personally felt could get offensive) I felt that it important to get a proposal on the table, so that we can agree if this is the kind of thing we want in principal, and then we can get pedantic about semantics and my grammar. So in your comments, please remember to say if this is the kind of thing that you want content wise and the kind of style that we want It is a bit plagiarized from our home site, but we do not mind. <this is it> Understanding the guidelines involves remembering that not all devices are the same, (e.g. keypads, brail readers ) not all systems are the same, (e.g. voice browsers, screen magnifiers) and not all people are the same. (From the visually impaired, low motor coordination, to the learning disabled, what make you unique?) In implementing the guidelines one must attempt to cater for the maximum number of people in the maximum number of scenarios. This can be achieved though a single accessible rendering or multiple accessible renderings that are optimized for different situations. </this is it>
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 20:19:14 UTC