- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- cc: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In looking at the earl work we talked about the project for describing such a
language, and decided that it was really a seperate project, albeit related.
So at some point we should attempt this (there is a bunch of demand for it
out there) and we should be able to cleanly integrate it into existing
systems, but I still think it is essentially its own piece of work (and
fairly complex at that).
cheers
Charles
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Matt May wrote:
Your AERT document was pretty much the reason for the rule element. I think
it needs to be expanded to be machine-readable, though there are going to be
areas ("write clearly and simply") where no machine-readable rules exist.
etc...
as a response to
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ridpath" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
> The language that describes the rule needs to be precise and I'm wondering
> if it should be marked-up as well.
etc
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:03:19 UTC