Re: Agenda

Yes. It is an ongoing discussion of something that is fairly arbitrary. But
it is very difficult to discuss things if we don't have some common ways of
talking about them - like using the same names, and meaning the same things.

Chaals

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, William Loughborough wrote:

  At 12:54 PM 3/15/01 +1100, Jason White wrote:
  >At the face to face meeting, there was opposition to calling them "techniques"

  Why was this brought up?

  Was there support for calling them "techniques"?

  Isn't it a bit late to be changing this since the consensus was reached a
  few years ago? Where were the "opposition" then?

  The words "techniques document" although referring to a non-normative item
  might themselves be normative?

  Isn't this like the argument we resolved about "principles" vs. "guidelines"?

  --
  Love.
                   ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Friday, 16 March 2001 08:49:42 UTC