- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:50:14 -0800
- To: "Josh Krieger" <josh@zafu.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 10:14 AM 3/14/2001 , Josh Krieger wrote: >The first point says, replace all server-side imagemaps by client-side ones, >except where it's not possible. > >The second point says, add redundant links for all server-side imagemaps >[remaining]. But, because of the first point, the only server-side maps >remaining are those that can't actually be converted into client-side >imagemaps. In this case, it would then be impossible to actually list the >links of the map, and the second point is invalid. That's not entirely true, plus you have to realize that following one checkpoint does NOT mean that another checkpoint will be followed automatically, even if they are of the same priority level. What you are calling, in effect, a "bug" is actually a "feature" of checkpoint granularity. --Kynn Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 13:48:54 UTC