- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:58:00 -0800
- To: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
- Cc: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 05:01 PM 3/12/2001 , Matt May wrote: >Since the decision to claim compliance rests with a >site's designers, I think it's imperative that the bar they're reaching >for is well-defined, or they won't try at all. (I see similar issues >with 3.4 ["Use Multimedia to illustrate concepts"] and 3.7 ["Divide >information into smaller, more manageable units"].) You are correct that 3.4 and 3.7 are problematic. Hopefully if we can figure out what to do with 3.3, we can apply some of that knowledge to figuring out a "fix" for other checkpoints? --Kynn Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Tel +1 949-567-7006 ________________________________________ ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. ________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 22:05:08 UTC