- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:49:24 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
This was another action item from Boston face-to-face. The goal wsa to try to make this clearer, make it a "positive" if possible, not a "thou shalt not", explain the difference between -desired- animation and -undesired- animation, and hopefully make it something Cynthia doesn't hate. Dunno if I succeeded. :) BTW, note that I am flailing around for a good term; your thoughts on terminology are welcome. Action Item: Rewrite 2.2, make cynthia like it, turn it around to a positive 2.2 Use distractive presentations only when it is necessary to capture the user's attention. <!-- note: need a better term than "distractive presentations" -- I had originally written "distractive elements" but "elements" is a reserved word in markup and thus would be confusing to use in this context, perhaps --> <glossary>Distractive presentations</glossary> are design elements which interfere with the user's abilities to concentrate on a user-selected action, such as entering data, reading/hearing text, and so on. Presentation forms which cause distraction vary based on the type of communication employed. Visual distraction elements are based upon movement, such as animation effects. Sound distractions <!-- ideas for this? -->. Multimedia presentations combine one or more of these techniques. Because distractive presentations make it harder for the user to perform a task, they should be used only when there is a specific need to capture the user's attention. For example, <glossary>alerts </glossary> should use distractive techniques, and distractive techniques may prove useful for highlighting specific changes or to provide context for user input (such as an animated cursor indicator). Note: There is no one standard to say what would be a distraction for any given user; people are individuals and what may be a major distraction to one person might be easily ignored by others. -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 10:16:02 UTC