- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 07:40:40 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 09:29 AM 3/9/01 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>We actually need to cover both parts
Let's get specific.
Do we go back to "until user agents" and detail how to do stuff without
using CSS?
Do we ignore SMIL, SVG, and other probably-long-time-a-coming stuff and not
have them as notions informing checkpoints?
What do we do about LONGDESC? SUMMARY? TITLE? and their different renderings?
Without "just say no" attitude, how do we get into "both parts" in regard
to having scripts do good stuff but allow excision of bad stuff? Are we
even equipped to have techniques for script/applet/object preparations?
What does "synchronization" of multimedia mean to a user with a 386 and 4
MB of memory and a 20 MB Hard Drive?
Have we a glossary entry for "normative"?
If as is claimed 96% of all systems in use have capability of displaying
Flash or delivering RealMedia are the other 4% (of which it is likely that
an inordinately high proportion are our clients) to stare hopelessly across
that particular arm of the digital divide?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 10:41:23 UTC