- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 10:59:35 +0100
- To: jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au, love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough)
- Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 3:43 PM +1100 3/9/01, Jason White wrote: >From the standpoint of >accessibility, the question is: what components of a typical web page >are poorly captured by the currently available repertoire of XHTML >elements? There are huge, vast amounts of things which are commonly done with web pages which don't even begin to come close to being captured in any version of XHTML. HTML -- X or otherwise -- is a downright lousy language for web design. Unfortunately, it's really the _only_ language for web design. (Or the main one -- this is why so many people are flocking to Flash or other quick fixes!) --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 05:05:51 UTC