- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 10:09:57 -0800
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, gv@trace.wisc.edu, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 12:00 PM 3/8/01 -0500, Al Gilman wrote:
>That's why I suggest we not try to close this thread in GL without
>consultation using xtech
And at least one old geezer would make this more than a "suggestion". It's
part of why the glossaries must be mutually aware so that we don't
understand that "content" is a heavily context/nuance sensitive "collection
of letters".
I have planted the seed of glossary/dictionary/thesaurus/+ awareness in the
DI WG. Therein we are (hopefully not terminally) "discussing" what "device"
means!
To do usable stuff we must at least *do* something and although seemingly
endless discussions about (DI's) "is the Web a device?" and (RDF's) "is
reification a stating or a statement?" are necessary we can't work
through/around them if: 1) we don't take a vote now and then; 2) we have to
wear flameproof suits.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 13:10:22 UTC