- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 11:18:41 +1100 (EST)
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Thursday, 15 February, 2100 UTC (4 PM Boston, 10 PM Sophia, 8 AM Melbourne), on the W3C/MIT Longfellow bridge: +1-617-252-1038, with the following agenda: 1. WCAG 2.0 issues, as follows: a. Note accompanying guidelines 1 referring to user agent capabilities: does this designate the capabilities of what the user actually has, or the user agent/assistive technology that they could acquire? Is this a relevant question here? b. Should we add a requirement that audio-only timed interactions should be synchronzied (presumably with text?) This issue was raised at an earlier meeting. Essentially it was the question of how to treat medium-specific content (other than multimedia) which requires a time-based response. 2. Management of the process by which techniques will be developed, tested and approved. We need to determine the framework in which the techniques will be developed, in preparation for the face to face meeting, large parts of which will be devoted to techniques. 3. Documentation of assumptions: we resolved last week to incorporate questions of user agent capability, so far as possible, in to the task of developing techniques, as it arises at a technology-specific level. Nevertheless, the issue still emerges at a higher (checkpoint) level: see checkpoint 1.7, and possibly elsewhere in the guidelines. How should we define the requirement of checkpoint 1.7, or should it be moved into an introductory (or advisory) section and out of the checkpoints as such? Or, if we decide that the Techniques will in any respect be normative, should checkpoint 1.7 be tied to the specific (evolving) requirements established at the technique level?
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2001 19:18:44 UTC