- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 04:40:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
-- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:17:47 -0800 From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@opendesign.com> To: "Charles McCathieNevile (E-mail)" <charles@w3.org> Subject: 15 minutes of notes Hi Charles, Here's the first few minutes of minutes. Cynthia +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Jason Greg William Charles Loretta Cynthia Marti Dick User Agent Capabilities There is a checkpoint that requires backward compatibility. How do we determine degree? What is the impact on conformance? Charles: tracking UA capabilities. When can we reasonably expect everyone to have a UA that does something? When is the feature so prevelent that we can stop supporting the alternatives? If you're still using Win 95, you are on your own to some extent. If you are still using DOS, is it reasonable for you to expect the same level of supprot Jason: There is a time at which a feature has been implemented enough that authors can expect it to be supported. And, there is a time at which it is reasonable to stop supporting a workaround for the missing feature. William: When does assistive tech qualify as being a user agent? Jason: Still under consideration by several working groups. Definitions in some guidelines assume for purposes of those guidelines that certain assitive techs are part of UA. We should wait for this decision.
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 04:40:01 UTC