- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:55:51 -0500
- To: Brian Kelly <b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>, David Peaslee <peasleed@lanecc.edu>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
The function you are describing is equivalent to the Errors-to: header in email. A review of the latest email RFCs and the site [overview] profile for RDF would see if this is covered in that scheme. But it seems dead easy to go ahead and just put: <meta name="SMTP-equiv" value="Errors-To:<edress>"> and create a backward-compatible option in that way. Al At 04:28 PM 2001-01-22 +0000, Brian Kelly wrote: >David Peaslee sent this message to the <www-html@w3.org> and ><www-talk@w3.org> lists. > >A reason not to have a text-only page is the difficulty on maintaining >separate resources. > >Looking at the page referred to in the message, I notice that it has an >XHTML Valid icon, and is linked back to the W3C's XHTML validator (and the >page is still valid). > >I suspect that many pages which started off valid become corrupted when they >are updated. > >Would it be worthwhile suggesting to W3C (and other organisations such as >CAST) that these validation services could ask for the email address of a >page author, and periodically check that a page is still valid, and send >email if it's not. > >There are similar services which will send email if a page contains broken >links. > >There is a business model for providing subscriber-funded services - and >probably not too much software development work needed to develop a free >one. > >Brian >-------------------------------------------------------------- >Brian Kelly >UKOLN >University of Bath >BATH >BA2 7AY >Email: B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk >Phone: (+44) 1225 323943 >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David Peaslee" <peasleed@lanecc.edu> >To: <bmilloy@interlog.com>; <WStreett@mail.monmouth.com>; <chas@munat.com>; ><aswartz@swartzfam.com> >Cc: <sean@mysterylights.com>; <www-html@w3.org>; <www-talk@w3.org> >Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:06 PM >Subject: RE: WWW: Interoperability Crisis? > > >I author a web page that uses both HTML and a text only page using XHTML. ><http://www.lanecc.edu/disability/disabled.htm>http://www.lanecc.edu/disab ility/disabled.htm >Why can you not add a text only page for users who are needing to access >informaton from your internet page? > >David Peaslee, AT tech >Disability Services >Lane Community College >4000 E 30th Ave >Eugene, OR 97405 >(541) 747-4501 x 2150 >peasleed@lanecc.edu > >>>> "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com> 01/21/01 12:57PM >>> >Wilbur Streett: >"If you want to help the blind do it yourself, don't force the burden onto >others." > > >So he should go to all the owners of web sites whose pages are inaccessible >to the blind and offer his services for free? Let's see, if he can fix one >site a day, he'll be finished in, oh... where's my calculator. Hmmm. Well! I >guess he'll never finish. > >What exactly are you recommending, Mr. Streett? > >Charles F. Munat, >Seattle, Washington >
Received on Monday, 22 January 2001 12:49:04 UTC