- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 18:22:39 -0500
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
AG:: Would you walk through this and explain how it works? Who is doing what to whom, blow by blow? Al At 05:05 PM 2001-01-04 +0000, Sean B. Palmer wrote: >"To whoever it may concern", >I've noticed that the usage of <address> as set out in HTML 4.01 is rather >ambiguous. The definition [1] says "details about the author", but the >example contains date information as well... I take the example as being a >normative extension to the definition. > >Anyway, what this implies is that <address> is metadata. So would it be >better to use RDF? Of course...but you still want to see it inline >sometimes. So use inline RDF? Exactly:- > ><rdf:Description rdf:about=""> > <address> > <div> > <dc:author> > <a href=" <mailto:sean@mysterylights.com>mailto:sean@mysterylights.com">Sean B. Palmer</a> > </dc:author> > </div> > <div> > <dc:date>2001-01-04</dc:date> > </div> > </address> ></rdf:Description> > >Triples:- > >mydoc.html --[rdf:Description]--> html:address >html:address --> > dc:author -> Sean B. Palmer > dc:date -> 2001-01-04 > >Pretty obvious I suppose, but I wanted to say it anyway... > >The first person to point out my main inaccuracy gets a free off-list rant >about using XHTML m12n to add RDF to XHTML :-) > >[1] <http://www.w3.org/>http://www.w3.org/TR/html40/struct/global.html#edef-ADDR ESS > >Kindest Regards, >Sean B. Palmer ><http://infomesh.net/sbp/>http://infomesh.net/sbp/ ><http://www.w3.org/WAI/>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] >"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." > - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07. >
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 18:17:39 UTC