- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 05:39:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
It hink that proposals should come to, and be discussed by, the working group at large. (That is how we have done it so far, and we need teh wide review that offers for each technique or proposal). But if there is a single person nominated as responsible for putting those into the document, and if that single person is not always the one overworked individual (instead being a collection of overworked individuals) it is easier to chase a particular update... cheers Charles McCN On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Lisa Seeman wrote: Perhaps we could run it a bit like PF is run, each group writes there document, and then the rest of us review it. That not outstanding, I think we can all contribute to the work of the other groups. Looking forward to being inundated with techniques (Kynn?) All the best, Lisa -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia until 6 January 2001 at: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 05:39:18 UTC