Re: List of Technologies

> I think that despite what our resident purist may think, we
> will definitely have to refer to non-standard HTML.

Actually, this resident "purist" agrees. In a way <dfn
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">all markup is proprietary</dfn>.

And anyway, I like HTML 2.0; in *some* ways it's purer than XHTML 1.1

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
   - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.

Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 11:39:36 UTC