- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 13:54:07 -0000
- To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, <wendy@w3.org>, "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> I think it's time that we start looking at developing technology-
> specific techniques documents in parallel with the guidelines.
I fully agree.
FWIW, here is my attempt at a more definitive list of techniques documents
than the one Kynn gave:-
Techniques for:-
- XHTML
- CSS Style for XHTML
- XHTML m12n
- XHTML for XML Pure UIs?
- {XML (DTDs)
- XML Schemas}
- CSS Styling for XML
- SVG
- SMIL
- MathML?
- WML?
- Scripting langauges (ASP/PHP/CGI)?
- ECMAScript???
In regards to XHTML, maybe it can be split up according to priority levels
(if any) for WCAG 2.0. In other words, a Techniques document for "priority
1", one for "priority 2" etc.
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
- Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2001 08:56:59 UTC