- From: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:57:02 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I'm leaving for Europe in a couple of days; I may be unable to connect regularly while traveling, but I'd like to give 2.4 another shot before the face-to-face in Amsterdam. I've tried to incorporate the discussion to date. My current draft: 2.4 If at all possible, do not limit the time that a user may need to understand or interact with your content. * When a time limit cannot be avoided, move as much content and interaction as possible out of the time-limited segment. * Provide disabled users with a means to bypass or extend any remaining time limit. * Use delayed refresh or redirection only when necessary to bring superceded content up to date. * Content must cooperate with user agent mechanisms for preventing motion (including flicker, blinking, flashing, auto-scrolling etc) and for control of the rate at which motion occurs. -- Adam Reed areed2@calstatela.edu Context matters. Seldom does *anything* have only one cause.
Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 14:57:16 UTC