- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:02:27 -0400
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Well said, William!
I like something on the order of "provide alternative content for all
content and pieces of content".
Anne
At 08:13 AM 5/21/01 -0700, William Loughborough wrote:
>Although PF is "member-private" the Working Draft of XMLGL is public
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/gl-20010508
>so I'm not violating any trust by quoting its Checkpoint:
>
>1.1 Provide a mechanism to explicitly associate alternative equivalents for
>content or content fragments. [p1]
>
>Which comes under its Guideline:
>
>1.0 Ensure that authors can associate multiple media objects as alternatives
>
>The sense expressed in the phrase "multiple media objects" is IMO much more
>fitting/general for WCAG 2's Checkpoint 1.1 intent than the current "text
>equivalent for all non-text content".
>
>
>--
>Love.
> ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
>
>
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Monday, 21 May 2001 17:53:33 UTC