- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 20:43:05 -0700
- To: <ryladog@earthlink.net>, "3WC WCAG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 10:59 PM 5/9/01 -0400, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:
>Aren't pictures and symbols more universal, understood by more people
>around the world, than a single language?
IMO, No.
KH:: "They are already there in universal symbols on signs all around the
world..."
WL: They're not really universal. Perhaps there will be something that
realizes Bliss' dreams of his symbols becoming a universal language but
we're not even close yet.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2001 23:41:44 UTC