- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 04:09:16 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Alt: Yes. (I had that at one stage, but this document has died on me a few times. Actually I think there are some wrong alt text things as well. Hopefully I will have it cleaned up... hopefully, hopefully, hopefully. Images themselves: One of the ideas I had behind content generators and programming tools icon 1 (that is the set I did) was to try and put things that people who are needing to read this will understand, or recognise, and people who are not needing to understand it will easily distinguish thenm and not get them confused with something that they think is intersting. (I am not sure exactly how to express that as a general rule yet, but that's why we are having teh discussion <grin/>) I think for the context of this (identifying different tyypes of authoring tool) I was trying to focus on what the product of the tool was, not what the orignal algorithm might be. (Which means that I agree with what you said about the content, but I am not sure how else to express it). Maybe it just means that I didn't really think hard enough about that either. Anyway, thanks for the commetns. - keep 'em coming. By the way, if you have other icons to propose, please feel free - the Working group is looking for the best set we can get... cheers Charles On Tue, 1 May 2001, Adam Victor Reed wrote: I have an attention deficit, so I often use lynx to avoid distractions. Alt text appears in place of graphics, so it merges with other text if not set off with punctuation. It is NOT accessible if it appears as 1. Markup tools icon one Markup tools icon two Markup tools icon three Markup Editing Tools: Tools that assist authors to produce markup documents. These include text-based and WYSIWYG markup Instead of alt="Markup tools icon one", could we please have alt=" [Markup tools](icon one) " now, and just alt=" [Markup tools] " when used as an actual icon in the future? (Yes, I'm willing to write a techniques document on writing accessible alt text.) As for the icons themselves, I think literal images of traditional tools (icon 2 (pen on pad) for markup and content, icon 1 (camera) for multimedia creation, icon 3 (programmers terminal) for programming) are more accessible (especially for readers with cognitive deficits) than abstract metaphors (such as pen-on-film, something never seen in reality but shown in icon 2 for multimedia; or the abstract schematics in icon 1 for content and programming). -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2001 04:09:25 UTC