- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 17:28:34 -0400
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
William,
I'd like to read what you read, but couldn't find it. sigh! Even used
the search feature for "introduction" and saw several introductions, but
didn't recognize what you read.
Anne
At 07:00 AM 5/1/01 -0700, William Loughborough wrote:
>As Working Drafts proliferate I have become guilty of "overskim" and didn't
>notice how good the Introduction has become, in fact answering rather
>resoundingly the criticisms of this as an "unreadable" document.
>
>Of course the "Comprehension" and "Technology Considerations" principles'
>text should have big "@@"s since they need much fleshing out in the same
>"conversational" vein as the "Presentation and Interaction" parts.
>
>Just reading this kind of presentation is going to be a major informant for
>anyone wanting to know what this stuff is all about.
>
>
>--
>Love.
> ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
>
>
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com
http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2001 17:21:04 UTC