- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 07:35:37 -0400
- To: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Jonathon, I would think the simple summaries on those pages would be too difficult for most of your people to read/understand. Am I wrong? Anne At 08:38 AM 4/21/01 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >It remains a fact that unless content is summarised in a suitable form it >remains inaccessible. > >In the UK a significant part of scientific budgeting is set aside for >'copus' http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/scforall/copus.htm > The Committee on the Public Understanding of Science (COPUS) . No one is >expecting all members of the public to understand all the details, that is >naturally unachievable. However it is recognised that the public has a right >to understand what is being funded. > >jonathan chetwynd >IT teacher (LD) >j.chetwynd@btinternet.com >http://www.signbrowser.org.uk > > Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Saturday, 21 April 2001 07:28:45 UTC