- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:55:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Lois Wakeman <lois@lois.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Actually, even saner would be to be able to query the image itself for its description. See, for example, Describing and retrieving photos using RDF and HTTP - a W3C note at http://www.w3.org/TR/photo-rdf/ which shows how this can be done. It should also be possible to do this for out of line images using a service like Annotea http://www.w3.org/2001/02/Annotea but I haven't managed it yet. I'll chase the Annotea team to find out if it is me or them... cheers Charles McCN On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, gregory j. rosmaita wrote: aloha, again! it just struck me as i tried to fall asleep that the sanest syntax (given the present state of affairs) with which to link a CSS-generated graphic to a textual equivalent/description might be the following (warning: the second URI is fictitious): background-image: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/qabg.png); background-image-longdesc: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/longdesc/qabg.html) or background-image: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/qabg.png); background-image-alt: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/longdesc/qabg.html) or background-image: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/qabg.png); background-image-desc: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/longdesc/qabg.html) the contents of the background-image-longdesc or background-image-alt or background-image-desc could then be pulled inline by the browser/UA to provide for an inline textual description if (a) image loading is turned off, and (b) the UA is configured to display descriptions of background images inline--and, if condition b were met, then the content of the BODY of the document referenced by the background-image-longdesc/alt/desc could then be rendered in place of the background image, or be made available via a context menu type functionality from a placeholder graphic, or be accessible in toto via a UA-generated hyperlink, etc. perhaps there are 3-levels for which functionality is needed: background-image: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/qabg.png); background-image-alt: "Quality Assurance and Conformance"; background-image-longdesc: url(http://www.w3.org/QA/images/longdesc/qabg.html) with the background-image-alt being required if using background-image, or perhaps the pseudo-elemental "content" construct (actually, i think the correct term is "property") could simply be recycled for the purpose of providing a brief textual alternative? gregory, who probably should be asleep. -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 06:55:03 UTC