Re: what type of document do we want?

At 12:40 AM 4/4/01 -0400, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>I think we should maintain the requirements (checkpoints) for things like 
>illustration and use of simple clear language

Then we are agreed that the guideline document itself should conform to its 
own checkpoints and therefore be illustrated (appropriately)?

The language being simple is as Gregg is wont to quote Albert "simple but 
not too simple"?

We better get honkin' on icons/illustrations.

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2001 00:53:38 UTC