Sunday, 1 July 2001
Saturday, 30 June 2001
- Re: photos of the meeting
- Re: photos of the meeting
- Re: photos of the meeting
- Re: Semantic pragmatic
- Re: photos of the meeting
- VS: Tunnel vision, cinemasense and guidelines
Friday, 29 June 2001
- Re: photos of the meeting
- Re: photos of the meeting
- RE: Server-side techniques?
- Re: photos of the meeting
- Server-side techniques?
- photos of the meeting
- Next F2F meeting: 10/11 September 2001, Redmond, WA, USA
- Re: Technniques for Accessibility Evaluation and Repair - Technique 7.5.1
- Ang: Re: Comments on WCAG2.0 Working Draft
- Re: Semantic pragmatic
Thursday, 28 June 2001
Wednesday, 27 June 2001
Friday, 29 June 2001
Wednesday, 27 June 2001
- Comments on WCAG2.0 Working Draft
- Re: Semantic pragmatic
- Re: Semantic pragmatic
- Re: Semantic pragmatic
- WCAG meeting arrangements
Tuesday, 26 June 2001
Wednesday, 28 June 2000
Tuesday, 26 June 2001
Wednesday, 28 June 2000
Friday, 22 June 2001
Thursday, 21 June 2001
- Re: phones
- re: system requirements
- phones
- System Requirements
- notes from first f2f breakout on graphics
Tuesday, 19 June 2001
Thursday, 14 June 2001
- 14 June 2001 WCAG WG telecon
- regrets for today's call
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Agenda
Wednesday, 13 June 2001
- RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
- RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
- RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
- RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
- Re: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- RE: Revising 2.4
- Re: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f
Tuesday, 12 June 2001
Monday, 11 June 2001
- Re: Revising 2.4
- Re: Revising 2.4
- RE: Revising 2.4
- Revising 2.4
- RE: Reason Revisited
- Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)
- RE: Proposal: 2.4 rewording
- RE: Proposal: 2.4 rewording
- RE: Reason Revisited
Sunday, 10 June 2001
- Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording
- Proposal: 2.4 rewording
- Reason Revisited
- HTML - WCAG Meeting Minutes, June 7, 2001
Friday, 8 June 2001
Thursday, 7 June 2001
Wednesday, 6 June 2001
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- Intro Re-do
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas (resend with valid attachment)
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
Monday, 4 June 2001
- Re: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- Re: Skip Nav Ideas
- RE: Skip Nav Ideas
- Re: Skip Nav Ideas
- Skip Nav Ideas
- Re: Len's Legacy and Accessible Folder Tabs
- RE: Len's Legacy and Accessible Folder Tabs
- Accessible Folder Tabs
- Len's Legacy Lives On...................
Saturday, 2 June 2001
Thursday, 31 May 2001
- belated regrets for today's call
- Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- WCAG Meeting Minutes, June 01, 2001
- addresses for today's call
- minute taker for today's call??
- Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- minute taker for today's call??
- Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- RE: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- RE: Updating 2.4, re-revised
- Updating 2.4, re-revised
- RE: Updating 2.4, rewritten
- Re: Agenda for face to face meeting
- Agenda for face to face meeting
- RE: Updating 2.4, rewritten
Wednesday, 30 May 2001
Tuesday, 29 May 2001
Monday, 28 May 2001
Sunday, 27 May 2001
Saturday, 26 May 2001
Friday, 25 May 2001
Thursday, 24 May 2001
- sound was Re: "Complex illustrations do not express many ideas with the same clarity as complex text."
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- thursday's meeting cancelled
- Len Kasday University Obituary
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
Wednesday, 23 May 2001
- Re: Revising 2.4, cont.
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Revising 2.4, cont.
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Revising 2.4, cont.
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Revising 2.4, cont.
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: summary of new issues from this week's list discussions
- Re: Revising 2.4 (revised)
- Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers
- "Complex illustrations do not express many ideas with the same clarity as complex text."
- Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
Tuesday, 22 May 2001
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Checkpoint 11.4
- FW: Len Kasday Offficial
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- Re: words
- Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
Monday, 21 May 2001
- RE: words
- summary of new issues from this week's list discussions
- Re: 1.1 revisited
- Re: More on checkpoint 1.1
- words
- Re: More on checkpoint 1.1
- RE: Graphic Designers work
- Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?
- wd: Memorial for Len Kasday
- More on checkpoint 1.1
- 1.1 revisited
- RE: Extensive forms
- WAI Glossary comparison with ANSI "standard definitions"
- FW: Extensive forms
Sunday, 20 May 2001
- Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1
- Re: Including content modes in 4.1
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- Re: Silence
- Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- Guideline 1.5 and "Document" added
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- the meaning of the term document in WCAG2
- Silence
Saturday, 19 May 2001
Friday, 18 May 2001
- RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- Web Accessibility Tutorials in June
- URGENT: booking rooms in Amsterdam
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- Intro Updated
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
Thursday, 17 May 2001
- RE: Introduction
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1
- 17 May 2001 WCAG WG minutes
- RE: Introduction
- RE: Extensive forms
- UTF-8 RFC
- RE: PDF Techniques Help Please
- Re: Agenda
- Hotels for June F2F
- Introduction to WCAG 2.0
- Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc
- Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc
- Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc
Wednesday, 16 May 2001
- Comments on PDF Techniques doc
- Re: Agenda - PDF Techniques address
- Fwd: (X)HTML Version Icons
- Re: Left click (and fine motor instability)
- Re: Left click (and fine motor instability)
- Re: Left click (and fine motor instability)
- Left click
- Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration]
- Re: Agenda
- Request to Join
Tuesday, 15 May 2001
- Agenda
- Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration]
- Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration]
- Test Case for grouping of Links and whitespace
- Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration]
- Registration for the June F2F in Amsterdam is open until 8 June
- Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
Monday, 14 May 2001
- Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: Against zero-sum games
- Re: Introduction, p.s.
- Re: Introduction
- IE stand on window pop-ups
- Re: Against zero-sum games
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Illustration - checkpoint proposal
- Re: Against zero-sum games
Sunday, 13 May 2001
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Against zero-sum games
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Against zero-sum games
- Against zero-sum games
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
Saturday, 12 May 2001
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- security cookie in image
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
Friday, 11 May 2001
- Re: Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3
- Re: Introduction
- Re: Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Attention deficits
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- off topic RE: Policy use
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Policy use
- Out of Box Thinking
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- Policy use, was RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- the train that comes out of the screen makes most people duck even on first site of the medium
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Introduction
- Introduction
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
Thursday, 10 May 2001
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: FW: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
Friday, 11 May 2001
Thursday, 10 May 2001
- conditional versus optional content (thread from UA list)
- 10 May 2001 WCAG WG minutes
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- FW: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: Illustrating Guidelines
- Belated Regrets
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Agenda
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Fwd: Assets 2002 - Call for Participation
Wednesday, 9 May 2001
- Re: HCI International 2001
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- HCI International 2001
- RE: ALT with INPUT
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- RE: FYI: MacroMedia Releases DreamWeaver/UltraDev 508 Web Accessibility Extentensions
- Re: Illustrating Guidelines
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
Tuesday, 8 May 2001
Wednesday, 9 May 2001
Tuesday, 8 May 2001
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- RE: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face
- Re: cross posted form IG
Monday, 7 May 2001
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- RE: indenting in a table
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- RE: Extensive forms
- RE: What is illustrated
- Re: cross posted form IG
Sunday, 6 May 2001
- RE: Extensive forms
- RE: skipnav
- wendy? where are you <smile>?
- Re: cross posted form IG
- RE: skipnav
- Re: cross posted form IG
- RE: skipnav
- skipnav
- FW: indenting in a table
- FW: Use relative sizing and positioning
- cross posted form IG
- Re: on measures of reading level
Friday, 4 May 2001
- Re: What is illustrated
- Re: on measures of reading level
- RE: Extensive forms
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Resources for Best Web Colors for icons - considering the colorblind
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Re: What is illustrated
- Re: on measures of reading level
- on measures of reading level
- Re: alt to text
- What is illustrated
- Minutes 03 May 2001 Ready
- Re: alt to text
Thursday, 3 May 2001
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Meeting Minutes 03 May 2001
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt to text
- Re: Agenda
- Re: alt to text
- Re: Agenda
- Agenda
- regrets for Thursday's call
Wednesday, 2 May 2001
- Re: alt to text
- Re: Kudos for intro
- Re: alt to text
- Re: alt for icons
- Re: alt to text
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- alt to text
- Re: alt for icons
- Re: alt for icons
- Re: alt for icons
- Re: alt for icons
- Re: alt for icons
- RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: alt for icons
- RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? TRIAL
- Re: alt for icons
- alt for icons
Tuesday, 1 May 2001
- Re: Kudos for intro
- RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: Kudos for intro
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? TRIAL
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Kudos for intro
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- WHat makes Icons accessible or not?
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
Monday, 30 April 2001
Sunday, 29 April 2001
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes)
- Re: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning disabilities
- RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
Saturday, 28 April 2001
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
Friday, 27 April 2001
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes)
- Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability?
- can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes)
- Meeting Minutes 04-26-2001
- Accessibility and Device Independence
- Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes
- Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes
Thursday, 26 April 2001
- 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes
- regrets
- RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities
- RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities
- RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning d isabilities
- EARL 0.9 Release
Wednesday, 25 April 2001
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Web page development
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning d isabilities
- Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning disabilities
- Re: "CC/PP"
- Re: "CC/PP"
- Re: "CC/PP"
- Agenda
- "CC/PP"
Tuesday, 24 April 2001
- Re: Content negotiation
- Re: Content negotiation
- Re: Government was Re: safety, accessibility and cars
- Re: personal schedule until 7 May - need for scribes next 2 WCAG meetings
- personal schedule until 7 May - need for scribes next 2 WCAG meetings
- Action Item: Jason & Katie; Simpler Language Alt
- Action Item: PDF Techniques, please review and comment
- Etiquette and use of the wai-gl listserv
- Re: Government
- Re: Government
- Government was Re: safety, accessibility and cars
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: safety, accessibility and cars
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Content negotiation
- Re: Compliance ratings
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: Compliance ratings
- Sample Web Page
- Re: FW: Maximize Web Site Usability
- Re: Some more thoughts re 3.3 etc.
- Re: safety, accessibility and cars
- Re: Of course cost is relevant
- Re: Compliance ratings
- FW: Maximize Web Site Usability
- Re: Compliance ratings
- Re: Compliance ratings
- RE: Green Fingers
- Re: Content negotiation
Monday, 23 April 2001
- Re: Compliance ratings
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Compliance ratings
- Compliance ratings
- Content negotiation
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Re: Green Fingers
- RE: Accessibility of ALT texts
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- RE: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Another gardening site produced by LDD students with help from staff
- Re: Green Fingers
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- Re: Green Fingers
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: Green Fingers
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- RE: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output,
Sunday, 22 April 2001
- Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: Suggestion to split the list
- multimodal content for cognitive effectiveness
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Suggestion to split the list
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
Saturday, 21 April 2001
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: accesskeys (www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/accesskey1.html)
- Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode
- Re: Access-Israel
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Sample of ideal page
- accesskeys (www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/accesskey1.html)
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: Access-Israel URL
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
Friday, 20 April 2001
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output,
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- Re: anne's first G3 mockup
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Amsterdam
- RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- alternative content for cognitive disabilities
- URGENT reply requested: next f2f
- Re: anne's first G3 mockup
- Re: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- RE: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Extensive forms
- INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms
- Extensive forms & tables accessibility question
- Browse button on forms
- Re: anne's first G3 mockup
- Re: anne's first G3 mockup
- Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks)
- Subject: Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode
- Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks)
- Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks)
- anne's first G3 mockup
- Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks)
- Access-Israel
- Re: 4/19 meeting notes
- Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode
- Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
Thursday, 19 April 2001
- Re: 4/19 meeting notes
- 4/19 meeting notes
- Re: RFD: Checkpoint 1.? Enable optional suppression of disabling content
- RFD: Checkpoint 1.? Enable optional suppression of disabling content
- PDF Techniques Help Please
- PDF Techniques Help Please
- Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode
- Re: Implementing vowel marks
- Re:Hebrew is a BILI language most of it is right to left. Implementing vowel marks
- Agenda
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
Monday, 16 April 2001
Sunday, 15 April 2001
Saturday, 14 April 2001
Friday, 13 April 2001
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style.
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: french dinners & affordance?
- Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style.
Thursday, 12 April 2001
- Notes on verifiability of checkpoints
- 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes
- Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style.
- Re: Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda)
- Re: Meeting agenda
- RE: what type of document do we want?
- Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style.
- Re: Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda)
- Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda)
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Lynx & what type of document do we want?
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: Meeting agenda
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: Lynx & what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- The problem of verification in WCAG 2.0
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
- Meeting agenda
- regrets for April 12 call
- Probable regrets for April 12 call
- RE: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Accesskey does not work on my OS
Tuesday, 10 April 2001
- Re: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Re: Accessibility of ALT texts
- Accessibility of ALT texts
- FW: Re: what type of document do we want?
- FW: Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
Monday, 9 April 2001
- The Comics/Web Connection (was: what type of document do we want?)
- Re: The Comics/Web Connection (was: what type of document do we want?)
Sunday, 8 April 2001
Saturday, 7 April 2001
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
Friday, 6 April 2001
Wednesday, 4 April 2001
- Meeting postponed
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
Tuesday, 3 April 2001
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- Re: what type of document do we want?
- RE: New Guideline proposal
- Re: what type of document do we want?