- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 10:47:06 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-gl <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
>Regarding an inaccessible page with link to accessible version, Ian wrote: > > Yes. The conformance claim should indicate the scope of the claim, > > in this case a combination of two pages. > > > (For background, refer to > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wai-pr-issues#conformance-alt-pages) How should we indicate the scope? Or are you saying, skipping ahead to your other comments, that specification of scope is something still being worked on? > Yes. And that's where we need to spend more time working on the > > metadata (schema?) to use in conformance claims. I get a mite bit worried about asking authors to learn about metadata/schema just to make a conformance claim. Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2000 10:44:35 UTC