- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 08:31:23 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, I was thinking a little more about Rob Neff's comment on the audience of the guidelines. The views and needs of the people who are creating web pages dynamically are different from people who are using static web pages. A key difference is that people who are creating web pages dynamically use HTML more as a presentation language than as a document description language. For these people, the structure of the dynamically generated wen pages are in such things as databases, XML, templates, etc. The HTML is ephemeral. A central theme through out the guidelines is that the HTML is specifying document structure. For example, it suggests using CSS instead of tables to structure the presentation. However, from the point of the person working with dynamic web pages, using tables is much easier than CSS for creating certain visual/presentation effects. Since the HTML is going to disappear, why not just use tables? Similarly, using the BLOCKQUOTE tag to create a visual appearance of indentation takes less effort than using CSS. Another problem is the idea of graceful transformation. Making sure that tables transform gracefully is a lot of work. It would be easier to decide when to use tables depending on the user and the browser. For a single page, changing a web page to look good on one type of browser can affect how it looks on another type of browser. However, with dynamically generated web pages, a different type of web page can be created for each type of browser. This reduces the problem of accomodating one type of browser negatively affecting another type of browser. Checking that a page looks good without the CSS is more work which people working with dynamic web pages can avoid. The issue of accessibility of applets, scripts, moving text, etc, can be simplified by creating different versions of the web page. One type of page can have these features which can be presented more easily in a visually appealing form without the additional burden of also including support for accessibility on the same page. Similarly, accompanying an imagemap with a list of textlinks is often fairly ugly. I think the guidelines need to be made less of a labor burden for people who are creating web pages dynamically. Scott
Received on Friday, 17 March 2000 11:35:43 UTC