- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 12:26:48 -0600
- To: "GL - WAI Guidelines WG \(E-mail\)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I encountered an insult in a memo from no less than 4 different people in the course of about a dozen emails. Some are worse than others but all are not helpful Lets see if we can do better. I know it gets frustrating sometimes in these discussions. I know that the ideas we post are not always easy to communicate. I know that the problems we are trying to solve are not easy - especially given the diversity of people with disabilities and the massive number of sites and technologies used on them. I know that we are not always understood. (and I know we don't always understand others) But we need to think about these issues very carefully. We need to think about each others comments very carefully. Then we need to draft our own very carefully. I would like to ask that members of the list 1) read the other people's postings twice if you have trouble with them. Three times if you are going to respond. 2) Read your own posting twice before sending it. You know how you meant it to sound. How might it sound to others. 3) If you try to re-summarize someone else's views (which is sometimes very effective) - try to address your note back to them in the form of a question like…”if I understand you correctly - it sounds like you are saying x y z. do I have that right?” It can be very helpful - or very aggravating to have your comments clarified by others depending on whether they get them right or not. But ALWAYS remember that we are all TRYING to work toward the same goal or we wouldn't be on this list. So lets try to take a walk/roll before we respond and read and think before we send. I want to also thank those who were on the receiving end and who didn't rise to it - but rather tried to focus back on the issues. You all are such a great group - and the issues we are facing are some of the tougher ones (we took care of the easier ones earlier). There is also such a careful balance we need to maintain between what is needed and what is possible today - that we need to be thinking about our own needs and those of others (including the webmasters) simultaneously. If we don't look out for them - why should we expect them to look out for us. And then we lose it. Because the law can provide encouragement and incentive - but it will never happen if we lose good will. Lawsuits can only address the most grievous problem with large sites or companies. Everything else will depend on keeping the good will of the webmasters and not losing the support of the public. (and not giving any ammunition to those who would attack accessibility) Having re-read this twice and edited it - I now post this. Please re-read both postings you are responding to and your own before you post. Especially if you are upset. And remember - we can all use a little exercise. Between memos can be a great time for it. Thanks everyone Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2000 13:24:07 UTC