- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:58:06 -0500
- To: love26@gorge.net, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 01:46 AM 3/14/2000 -0800, William Loughborough wrote: >If you have any ideas that might help, please let us know. The reason >for providing text alternatives for illustrations is that this is useful >for some people *AND WE KNOW HOW TO DO IT*. Of course we won't stop >calling for that in the guidelines. If we simply say "provide >alternatives to text" we are faced with the dilemma of trying to explain >how to do that and I have absolutely no idea where to begin. William, When I kept reading and re-reading the first guideline, it seemed to me that the answer of "How to do it" was right there in the guideline. Simply round out the guideline to include everything. If there is to be a text alternative to audio, then audio is an alternative to text. Likewise, graphics/illustrations, which require a text alternative, can be the alternative to text. Video or multi-media is also an alternative to text that is widely used (in the form of TV) by those who cannot process text. In the site, http://www.ih.k12.oh.us/ps/americana/Eberle/EBsongs.htm , two forms of information are provided, pictures of the persons, and songs that describe why these people are important to study. The only text on the page is the name of each person under the picture (which is the link to the music). While the substance presented on the page may be a bit limited for older folks, the format used can meet the needs of those who cannot process text. It really is do-able, William, but it does require thinking "out of the box" to look for what is useful to this population instead of text. It may be necessary to look at all the "bad stuff" that isn't accessible to those who prefer text, and identify those techniques that have come about because the non-education segment of the web audience like them, and determine those which have evolved because they meet needs of users, and insure that the guidelines don't discourage these formats. One of the most frequent "accommodation" provided to learning disabled high schoolers is to have a teacher or adult "mark up" or highlight the important facts in a text using color. Learning disabled as well as other kids are taught to use tables and illustrations to guide understanding. All children are taught to organize information into table format and to extract information from tables. Sometimes the information put in tables is "data" and can be easily linearized, but much tabular information is in sentences or paragraphs, and without the table format, the relationship between facts is lost. These are a few of the issues in the guidelines that I find problematic for this large segment of the disabled communities. There are undoubtedly more I haven't focused on. IMHO, the guidelines would be greatly improved if the need to provide alternatives to text were included and stated as accommodations to the needs of the many disabled who are now avoiding text on the web. Anne Anne L. Pemberton http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1 http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling apembert@crosslink.net Enabling Support Foundation http://www.enabling.org
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2000 18:12:50 UTC