- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:52:43 -0800 (PST)
- To: charles@w3.org, phoenixl@netcom.com
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, Charles One of the current problems is that there has been very little research into identifying what features screen reader users need to use a web without any concern about other disabilities. Since my focus has been on dynamically generated web pages, the technology supports creating individualized web pages so there is no need to worry about other disabilities. Various people have indicated that choosing a particular format from a set of choices is acceptable. For example, I believe that Gregory has indicated he prefers the text version of the New York Times because it better meets his needs and he can get the same information as is made available in the other format. Scott > The focus on only testing with screenreaders leads to a potential for > following a dead-end path too easily, since the guidelines are required to > provide solutions tht work for people with all disabilities. The prototype > development should take account of other accessibility requirements. > > Otherwise, this is indeed a sensible approach. > > Cheers > > Charles
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2000 15:53:32 UTC