- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:25:09 -0500 (EST)
- To: David M Clark <dclark@halftheplanet.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I don't think so. The situation I am thinking of is <applet class="something" ...> Some useful text tht can be rendered when the applet doesn't appear </applet> not the situtation where the stuff is somewhere else (on that account I agree with you) cheers Charles On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, David M Clark wrote: Charles, The way I understand it is somewhat analogous to d-tag/longdesc. The content may, in fact, be elsewhere in the doc, but the only way to verify 1-to-1 correspondence is by having it an alt. dc ------------------------------------------------------------------- David M. Clark Director of Accessibility halftheplanet.com Email: dclark@halftheplanet.com URL: http://www.halftheplanet.com Boston Office: 617/859-3069 (phone/fax) -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Charles McCathieNevile Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 9:35 PM To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org Cc: WAI GL Subject: alt for applets Reading through the current draft of the ERT (since that's all that is available) iI noticed that it requires "alt" for applet even when there is alternative content provided as content for the element. I'm not sure this is a good requirement. What do people think? Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2000 12:25:13 UTC