- From: Michael Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 23:38:07 -0500
- To: "Kynn Bartlett" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Cc: <dickb@microsoft.com>, <phoenixl@netcom.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
All, It might also be the best way to convey information to low bandwidth areas, which includes a large portion of the world. Sincerley, Mike BUrks -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kynn Bartlett Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 11:38 PM To: Scott Luebking Cc: dickb@microsoft.com; phoenixl@netcom.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: RE: New York Times web site At 08:19 PM 2/10/2000 , Scott Luebking wrote: >That was the checkpoint I was referring to. However, my statement >was not about text-only web sites, but web sites with parallel >graphic and text-only web pages which the checkpoint strongly >urges avoiding unless absolutely necessary. "absolutely necessary" is hard to define. Note, also, that it doesn't forbid the creation of text-only sites for _non-disability-access_ reasons. For example, it's possible that they think a text-only site is the best way to convey their information or they're trying to cater to a Lynx crowd. -- Kynn Bartlett mailto:kynn@hwg.org President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org/ AWARE Center Director http://aware.hwg.org/
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2000 23:52:40 UTC