- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 22:54:39 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > Thanks Al. > > To take up an issue: > > I am going to pretend for a minute that there are no until User > Agents... clauses. And then I'll get back to the real world. But humour me a > moment, if you will... > > If the working group changes the requirements, for example by publishing WCAG > 1.1 or 2.0 or something, then one of the things we could do is explicitly > request that WCAG 1.0 be moved from Recommendation Status to former > recommendation or obsolete recommendation or something. > There curently isn't > such a thing in the process of W3C, so it would need to be approved by the > Advisory Council/Committee (I don't recall what they are at the minute - > basically the members) but if it is a good idea then we have a duty to ask > for it anyway. I don't agree. There's no need to require new process. You just tell the AC during the review that document A will obsolete document B and they agree to that or they done. - Ian
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2000 22:54:41 UTC