Friday, 31 March 2000
- US Sec. 508 [was: Re: FW: ADA/ABA Accessibility Guidelines Notice of Proposed Rulemakin g]
- FW: ADA/ABA Accessibility Guidelines Notice of Proposed Rulemakin g
Thursday, 30 March 2000
- Invitation to review Evaluation and Repair Techniques document
- Email Advertising Special--Ends Friday
- Working group meeting schedule
Wednesday, 29 March 2000
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
- Email Advertising Works--Special Rates till Friday
- $$$---$150 for an icon of a man with trolley
- Re: Questions regarding compliance and alternative pages
- Re: Questions regarding compliance and alternative pages
Monday, 27 March 2000
Tuesday, 28 March 2000
Monday, 27 March 2000
- Email Advertising Special--Ends Friday
- RE: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- RE: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
Friday, 4 January 1980
Monday, 27 March 2000
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
Saturday, 25 March 2000
- Re: Printing using CSS
- Re: Accessible Design / JAWS
- RE: drilling down on checkpoints
- drilling down on checkpoints
- Email Advertising Special--Ends Friday
Friday, 24 March 2000
Thursday, 23 March 2000
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
Wednesday, 22 March 2000
- Re: Notes from the face2face
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: Notes from the face2face
- Notes from the face2face
- Re: TABINDEX - HTML Applications
Monday, 22 March 1999
Sunday, 19 March 2000
- Re: Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Some thoughts and Possible Action Steps for CD
- Re: form orientation, navigation, and submission techniques
Saturday, 18 March 2000
- Dalcho Information
- Re: Text equivalents
- Re: form orientation, navigation, and submission techniques
- Re: graphics generally complement, not replace, text
Friday, 17 March 2000
- Re: form orientation, navigation, and submission techniques
- Re: form orientation, navigation, and submission techniques
- graphics generally complement, not replace, text
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: Please Help me understand
- Re: GL's acceptance of the necessity of graphics on the web
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: Defining the needs of people with CD
- RE: Text equivalents
- Re: Feelings was: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: Please Help me understand
- Cognitiver Disability + Participation at CSUN WWW9 .....
- Re: Text equivalents
- Defining the needs of people with CD
- Re: Feelings was: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- RE: linearized tables
- RE: linearized tables
- Please Help me understand
- form orientation, navigation, and submission techniques
- GL's acceptance of the necessity of graphics on the web
- Regarding proposals for changes to the guidelines
- RE: linearized tables
- WAI at CSUN 2000!
Thursday, 16 March 2000
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- RE: Text equivalents
- Re: Thought for the day
- Thought for the day
- WOAW now. Lets all shake hands and come out talking
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- User Agent Guidelines
- Re: Front Page and Publisher
- Re: concerns with the Web Content guidelines
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Front Page and Publisher
Wednesday, 15 March 2000
Thursday, 16 March 2000
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: linearized tables
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- concerns with the Web Content guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
Wednesday, 15 March 2000
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- RE: linearized tables
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: Feelings was: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: WCAG face to face meeting agenda
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: Text equivalents
- Re: Text equivalents
- RE: Text equivalents
- Re: Text equivalents
- RE: Text equivalents
- RE: Text equivalents
- Please review: Techniques For Evaluation And Implementation Of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
- Feelings was: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: Text equivalents
- Re: Text equivalents
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Romance Enhancement Site
- Re: Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Text equivalents and cognitive considerations
- Re: WCAG face to face meeting agenda
- RE: linearized tables
- Re: Text equivalents
- Re: Text equivalents
- WCAG face to face meeting agenda
Tuesday, 14 March 2000
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: Text equivalents
- RE: linearized tables
- RE: linearized tables and FORMs
- Re: Markup to Support Navigation
- Markup to Support Navigation
- RE: linearized tables
- Re: linearized tables
- RE: linearized tables
- RE: linearized tables
- RE: linearized tables
- Re: Text equivalents
- Regulation and implementability Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: linearized tables
Monday, 13 March 2000
- Text equivalents
- Proposal for GL mailing list posting privileges change
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: linearized tables
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: problem with phone line
- problem with phone line
- Re: Request for Review
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: Request for Review
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Audience (long) was Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- content negotiation (was Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines)
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- RE: Accessible Web Designing
- RE: A proposal for changing the guidelines
Sunday, 12 March 2000
Saturday, 11 March 2000
Friday, 10 March 2000
- Re: A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Re: is this the best approach?
- RE: is this the best approach?
- A proposal for changing the guidelines
- Fwd: server side image maps guideline 1.2
- Fwd: linearized tables
- Re: minutes from today's call, next mtg is the face2face - 20 March.
Thursday, 9 March 2000
- minutes from today's call, next mtg is the face2face - 20 March.
- Re: Request for Review
- Simplifying the guidelines
- Fwd: Re: Request for Review
- non-w3c technologies module
- new draft of techniques
- Request for Review
Wednesday, 8 March 2000
- Re: more table tricks
- Re: more table tricks
- Re: more table tricks
- more table tricks
- request to join
- Agenda for Thursday's meeting
Tuesday, 7 March 2000
Monday, 6 March 2000
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
Sunday, 5 March 2000
- AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
Friday, 3 March 2000
Thursday, 2 March 2000
- Re: minutes from today
- minutes from today
- PDF Documents
- Re: Steps in developing technology
- Re: An example of a form with linked error messages
- RE: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- RE: text equivalents for multimedia
- Request to join
- Re: Agenda for Thursday's meeting
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
Wednesday, 1 March 2000
Thursday, 2 March 2000
- Re: An example of a form with linked error messages
- css inclusion
- Re: A poll for screen reader users
Wednesday, 1 March 2000
- Re: Reviewer role for WCAG
- Re: Reviewer role for WCAG
- Re: Reviewer role for WCAG
- Re: Reviewer role for WCAG
- Re: Reviewer role for WCAG
- Reviewer role for WCAG
- Re: accessibility and its meaning.
- An example of a form with linked error messages
Tuesday, 29 February 2000
- Agenda for Thursday's meeting
- Re: xml accessibility
- Re: accessibility and its meaning.
- Develop Your Mind, Research The Truth.
- minutes from last thursday
Sunday, 27 February 2000
- Request to Join
- SVG techniques
- Re: A technology gap (was Re: Steps in developing technology
- accessibility and its meaning.
- Re: A technology gap (was Re: Steps in developing technology
Saturday, 26 February 2000
- A technology gap (was Re: Steps in developing technology
- Commercial Unsolicited mail - Special offer from itc'99 online auction
Thursday, 24 February 2000
- Re: How far?
- How far?
- Re: is this the best approach?
- Re: is this the best approach?
- Re: Steps in developing technology
- Re: is this the best approach?
- Re: is this the best approach?
- is this the best approach?
- Re: Steps in developing technology
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
Wednesday, 23 February 2000
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: xml accessibility
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- Re: text equivalents for multimedia
- text equivalents for multimedia
- RE: alt for applets
- RE: alt for applets
- RE: alt for applets
- RE: alt for applets
Tuesday, 22 February 2000
- Agenda for Thursday's meeting
- New FCC NOI
- xml accessibility
- Steps in developing technology
- FW: comments to House Subcommitee
- Re: Some Comments on the Latest Techniques Draft an WCAG Minutes
Monday, 21 February 2000
- Some Comments on the Latest Techniques Draft an WCAG Minutes
- Re: Department of Defence Advanced Distributed Learning Network
- Department of Defence Advanced Distributed Learning Network
- alt for applets
Thursday, 17 February 2000
- Re: An RDF conformance scheme
- Re: An RDF conformance scheme
- Reminders and Minutes from 17 February 2000
- Re: An RDF conformance scheme
- Re: An RDF conformance scheme
- Re: Scripts on the web Re: Does CSUN Care About Web Accessibility
- Re: noframes & Content Guidelines
- Re: Scripts on the web Re: Does CSUN Care About Web Accessibility
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- Re: Web examples for visually imparied
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
Wednesday, 16 February 2000
- RE: [Fwd: Addition to the Record of the House Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Internet and ADA by Gregg Vanderheiden]
- Web examples for visually imparied
- Registration pages available for WAI meetings before and after CSUN
- techniques draft
- Re: Agenda for Thursday's meeting
- Agenda for Thursday's meeting
Tuesday, 15 February 2000
Monday, 14 February 2000
- Information and Registration for WAI meetings at CSUN
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- Re: keystrokes
Sunday, 13 February 2000
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- Reuest to join
- AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More
Friday, 11 February 2000
- New Techniques Working Draft
- RE: New York Times web site
- Re: Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- Labelling web page functionality for blind users
- RE: New York Times web site
- Re: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- Re: New York Times web site
- Re: New York Times web site
- RE: New York Times web site
- Re: FW: Browser 'back' is_a Undo (fwd)
Thursday, 10 February 2000
Wednesday, 9 February 2000
Monday, 7 February 2000
Sunday, 6 February 2000
- RE: GL SIGNUP - What if i already signed up in last few weeks?
- Re: Invitation to Join the NEW GL working Group
- Invitation to Join the NEW GL working Group
Saturday, 5 February 2000
- ISO standards
- Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- RE: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
Friday, 4 February 2000
- FW: All Set With Access
- IBM Accessibility Guidelines
- Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- Re: minutes posted
- WAI Meetings around CSUN, Confirmed Schedule
- RE: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
Thursday, 3 February 2000
Wednesday, 2 February 2000
Thursday, 3 February 2000
- RE: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- Request to Join
- online Dictionary.....
- Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
Wednesday, 2 February 2000
- Re: New subsection in techniques doc: Accessibility Reviewed Technologies
- Re: New subsection in techniques doc: Accessibility Reviewed Technologies
- RE: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- Re: attributes, software architecture, CC/PP and accessibility
- Re: attributes, software architecture, CC/PP and accessibility
- Review of Techniques Document and Agenda for Thursday's meeting
- Re: attributes, software architecture, CC/PP and accessibility
Tuesday, 1 February 2000
- Re: New subsection in techniques doc: Accessibility Reviewed Technologies
- Re: attributes, software architecture, CC/PP and accessibility
- attributes, software architecture, CC/PP and accessibility
- New subsection in techniques doc: Accessibility Reviewed Technologies
- Techniques: Document structure and metadata
- New techniques for Techniques
- Re: Research questions - the underlying issue? (was Re: XML
- Printing using CSS
- Re: An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- An article about Yahoo's simplicity of design
- Re: CSS and implementation
- Re: CSS and implementation
Monday, 31 January 2000
Sunday, 30 January 2000
Saturday, 29 January 2000
- Re: CSS and implementation
- Re: proposed clarification of TABLE caption, title, and summary for the techniques document
Friday, 28 January 2000
- Re: proposed clarification of TABLE caption, title, and summary for the techniques document
- Confirmed: WCAG WG weekly telecon
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: proposed clarification of TABLE caption, title, and summary for the techniques document
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Cognitive difficulties
- Re: proposed clarification of TABLE caption, title, and summary for the techniques document
- tidied up the home page (note that it gets updated _weekly_)
- Re: CSS and implementation
- proposed clarification of TABLE caption, title, and summary for the techniques document
Thursday, 27 January 2000
- minutes from today's call
- ETA tool is available
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or
- RE: Research questions - the underlying issue?
Friday, 28 January 2000
Thursday, 27 January 2000
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: Research questions - the underlying issue? (was Re: XML
- WE FIND MISSING PEOPLE for YOU.....Or it's FREE!!_ (7856)
- Cross-references in guidelines
Wednesday, 26 January 2000
- WE FIND MISSING PEOPLE for YOU.....Or it's FREE!!_ (8460)
- Re: agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or
- agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- proposed update to errata: meta data conformance schemes
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
Thursday, 27 January 2000
Wednesday, 26 January 2000
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: HI,IM,GARY L BORTON
- Re: some references on user need assessment
Saturday, 22 January 2000
Tuesday, 25 January 2000
Monday, 24 January 2000
- Table summary, caption, and title
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Request to Join
- Re: Research questions - the underlying issue? (was Re: XML and accessibility)
- Research questions - the underlying issue? (was Re: XML and accessibility)
- Request to Join
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Just wondering
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Request to Join
Sunday, 23 January 2000
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: flickering / animations
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- CSS and implementation
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: Does the user know for sure whether the page is dynamic or static?
- Re: some references on user need assessment
- Re: Request to Join
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
Saturday, 22 January 2000
- Re: XML and accessibility
- Re: XML and accessibility
- XML and accessibility
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- [w3c-wai-gl] <none>
- Request to Join
- Re: face-to-face
- Re: face-to-face
- WAI Meetings around CSUN, Tentative Schedule
Friday, 21 January 2000
- face-to-face
- Re: Dating conformance Re: URI correction Re: minutes posted
- Re: Dating conformance Re: URI correction Re: minutes posted
- Dating conformance Re: URI correction Re: minutes posted
- Re: URI correction Re: minutes posted
Thursday, 20 January 2000
- Save 50-80% on International Calls and Win $500 in Free phone calls!
- Dynamically generated web pages and disabled users
- URI correction Re: minutes posted
- minutes posted
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- errata updated for checkpoint 10.2
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
Wednesday, 19 January 2000
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- NOFRAMES, WCAG, & UAAG (was Re: noframes & Content Guidelines)
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- RE: clarification of table linearization
- RE: clarification of table linearization
- RE: clarification of table linearization
- Agenda for Thursday's meeting
Tuesday, 18 January 2000
Monday, 17 January 2000
- Re: Text needs to be written for a reader. A little longer than my usual...
- Text needs to be written for a reader. A little longer than my usual...
- An RDF conformance scheme
- Re: Test: tabindex-test (fwd)
- RE: Children
Sunday, 16 January 2000
- Re: flickering / animations
- Re: noframes & Content Guidelines
- Scripts on the web Re: Does CSUN Care About Web Accessibility
- Electronic Dental Claims via the Internet
Friday, 14 January 2000
- skateboard
- Children: was Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: form submission practices by authors
Thursday, 13 January 2000
- form submission practices by authors
- minutes from today
- Re: About tabindex and bypassing link
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: agenda for tomorrow's WCAG meeting
Wednesday, 12 January 2000
- Re: agenda for tomorrow's WCAG meeting
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- agenda for tomorrow's WCAG meeting
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: Second Browser Window Question
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps
- Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps
- Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps
- flickering / animations
- Re: screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- screen readers, browsers, & the reporting of ALT on & in image maps
- Proposal for unified conformance scheme
- RE: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
Saturday, 8 January 2000
Friday, 7 January 2000
- Re: acronym for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines working group
- RE: acronym for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines working grou p
- acronym for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines working group
- Re: Canadian Government Web Accessibility Test Facility
- Canadian Government Web Accessibility Test Facility
Thursday, 6 January 2000
Wednesday, 5 January 2000
Tuesday, 4 January 2000
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: FW: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
Monday, 3 January 2000
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- father xmas was Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: FW: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999
- Re: A "one size fits all" personalized web page?
- Re: UI Design Update newsletter - December, 1999