- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 22:36:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I believe there are a lot of issues with accesskey. For a start, only some users wll have the key specified available to them. And as Gregory says, using it may take over a key function for a particular user. An intelligent user agent would prevent this happening by remapping the key to something else, but then it is not clear how a user could identify the accesskey. It is also unclear how different systems are expected to use it - some software has ordinary keys as hotkeys (lynx, Opera), some uses accelerator keys (alt in windows, ctrl or alt or meta in unix, ctrl and command keys in macintosh) - what should the author tell the user, without knowing how the system works? At the moment the only implementations I know of are i Internet Explorer, but they are not consistent between versions. I recommend that we note the potential for conflict with existing bindings means that the User Agent should handle that and notification of how to activate keys (and register that as a dependency on the User Agent Group) and that we ask the PF group to work with the HTML group to respecify accesskey in such a way that it is not dependent on a particular keyboard arrangement. Charles McCN On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: Hello, As we were wrapping up the Techniques document for WCAG 1.0 we resolved that, "There most likely will be usability issues [with accesskey], but we will not be able to cover them in this initial release of the document. Therefore, this remains open to be discussed for the next version."
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 22:36:29 UTC