- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 23:53:27 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hello, I've formatted the requirements document draft [1] to look like a W3C working draft, added a status section, and added a 6th section called, <Q>Ensure that the revision is "backwards compatible"</Q>. This is not the best wording but tries to address some people's concern that those who have conformed with WCAG 1.0 will have to overhaul their sites to conform with WCAG 2.0 or that the existence of two sets of WAI content guidelines will confuse or frustrate people. This is a rough first pass. Suggestions are welcome! I have one question embedded in the status section that I think we need to answer: "Do we want to say something about when we expect to have an initial working draft of the revision published? (i.e., when are we aiming to publish the first public working draft?)" Thanks, --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2000/06/05-wcag20-req.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Monday, 5 June 2000 23:46:40 UTC