- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:26:24 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
No, I think it is more specific - to work on technologies used to make the web dynamic, specifically on scripting. Charles On Tue, 2 May 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: Charles, it sounds like your requirement then is more general. something along the lines of, "where there are widely implemented, inaccessible techniques, show examples of making them accessible." --wendy At 11:45 PM 4/28/00 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >There is a problem in that this is an insufficient strategy for current >technology. There are ways of writing things that are currently widely >implemented and making them more accessible, and we should work on those. > >Charles > >On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Jason White wrote: > > My personal preference would be to specify the DOM as the relevant > technology and to develop the techniques and strategies in a way that is > independent of the particular language (ecmascript, Java, or whatever) > that may be used. Of course, examples would be provided in specific > programming languages, but the requirement would be stated as a generic > one. > > > > >-- >Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 >W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI >Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 >Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /-- -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Monday, 8 May 2000 13:26:32 UTC