- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 12:23:06 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hello, Wendy suggested that I send this to the list. It was my response to the following question on the wai list: Q: What is the effect on usability if any if a whole site or a whole section of a site is database driven? A: This is a good question that the Web Content Guidelines Working Group intends to address in the next version of the Guidelines. My comments below do not represent consensus in the Working Group, but are based on my understanding of the problem. On the one hand, whether content is written by hand, created by an authoring tool, or generated by scripts from a database does not change the requirements for making it accessible. The content has to meet the requirements of WCAG 1.0 for device-independence, equivalent alternatives, navigation, orientation, etc. However, the answer is complicated for the case of content that is tailored to the particular capabilities of a user (or the user's software) based on some negotiation that takes place between the client and server. For example, if a user has configured the user agent to accept certain formats of content only (e.g., text), then the user has explicitly requested that the server not deliver alternatives. In that case, it would appear that the content does not meet the requirements for including equivalents. And yet the user has explicitly requested one format only. The WCAG 1.0 conformance requirements do not address this issue adequately. I would suggest that one way to resolve this issue is to consider the content "as a whole" that may be delivered by the server. Users must be able to get some form of content from the server that meets their needs, though they may choose to put a filter on that content. The accessibility of the site should be considered as a whole: can the user access the site as a whole, even if some parts of it may be inaccessible? - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2000 12:23:09 UTC