- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:51:39 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
CMcCN:: "Anyone been to a lecture where the presenter just spoke, with no visual aids, and found it difficult to access the content" WL: Although Gregory can answer this a little better than I, the answer is that *unexplained* visual aids might be as confusing (difficult) and frustrating. Retinal input is unarguably effective but it requires enormous training that is often ignored in discussions of this kind. Just as unillustrated speech might be "difficult", so undefined (I think that implies, even requires something like "text") visual communication might be confusing/ineffective/diversive. Although it may be true that we are what we eat, it is not clear that the world *is* what we see. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 14:52:46 UTC