- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:40:04 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 12:38 AM 4/4/2000 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >Some would, some wouldn't. Same as sighted people. For example, some of my >blind friends are much more visually capable than I am, and some aren't. An >analgous question might be to ask whether a blind person is going to be able >to adequately describe an image - currently a P1 requirement in a number of >situations. It's not the same, because a blind person can simply choose to -not- use an image if they feel they can't reasonably describe it...under the current guidelines. (This changes when images become a -requirement for accessibility-.) You do bring up a good point, however, that many people who can see are also not "visually capable" and may not be able to provide graphics easily. I'm not sure if -I- can provide decent graphics for my sites -- and I refuse to believe that I need to give up web design because people with CDs (supposedly) need graphics... -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/ Next of Kynn: a quasi-regular web log http://www.kynn.com/next/
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2000 11:45:29 UTC