- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 20:53:23 -0700
- To: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <jay@peepo.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 04:43 AM 4/2/2000 , Jonathan Chetwynd wrote: >However we can say with some certainty that whilst human designed pages are >a wonderful resource for CD clients, >current web based assistive technology is not of significant benefit in >browsing the average web page. >In particular screen readers are of very little use. Why is that? Can you expand further on this and give some examples of studies that support this conclusion? >It mainly centers around offering clients options such as text/no text in >their face, rather than hidden. I don't understand what you're saying here. Can you illustrate with pictures? >Mild aphasia which is rather common even in the general population means >that other routes than mouse control will be central to this development. Can you explain what is meant by "mild aphasia"? Assume that I know little to nothing about cognitive disabilities and am relying on you to provide complete definitions of terms you use. >Has anyone got a feely one working yet? >My two are still sitting in the wings. I assume by this you mean "I haven't gotten my 'feely' (tactile feedback?) mouse working yet -- has anyone else?" -- right? (Not having a 'feely' mouse, I have nothing to contribute on this topic other than the translation...) -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/ Director of Accessibility, edapta http://www.edapta.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ AWARE Center Director http://www.awarecenter.org/
Received on Monday, 3 April 2000 23:59:44 UTC