- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 03:03:35 -0500
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi Scott! I don't think these concepts conflict. Personalization is good in a sense that users can tailor the pages according to their needs. However, we shouldn't force users to tailor, we still need to offer good defaults. In WAI our goal is that the pages have enough information so that they can be tailored to meet the needs of the disabled users. That is why there is equivalent information. To help the management of the pages it is good that this information is attached to the page that is frequently updated etc. because then the information is easier to find and it is less probable that the equivalent information is not updated at the same time as the other information. There may then be gateways etc. that tailor the information to the needs of a specific group. Marja At 08:32 AM 12/23/99 -0800, Scott Luebking wrote: >Hi, > >I was in a meeting yesterday on campus and the issue of personalized >web pages for students to access their records came up. I guess >what I'm confused about is this issue of the "one size fits all" >approach to web pages and personalizing web pages. They just >seem so conflicting. What is the benefit to that student to limit >his/her personalized web page to a one-size approach when technology >like portals, XML etc, supports multiple formats? Also, the issue >of a "well structured" web page seems dependent on the perspective >of the user of the web page. > >For example, how do you explain that each student should have the same >format in case one of the student's is blind to someone who has been >spending months looking at software which allows personalized web >pages? > >Scott >
Received on Friday, 24 December 1999 03:05:54 UTC