- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:37:08 -0500 (EST)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- cc: "J.R. van Ossenbruggen" <Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl>, geoff freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, "webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net" <webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'pjenkins@us.ibm.com'" <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, www-smil@w3.org
Yes, but as far as I know that won't help since you aren't allowed to put the text somewhere else in the file (unless using comments or something, but that seems much too much of a hack to be a smart answer). Charles On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Chris Lilley wrote: "J.R. van Ossenbruggen" wrote: > > About the complaints that SMIL 1.0 forces you to split up the text in > many small files: > > Note that in SMIL 1.0, you can have text in the SMIL file by using the > <text src="data:..." /> syntax. I know this is not ideal when you > edit SMIL by hand: you probably will need some tool to escape the > illegal URI characters (such as spaces etc). In SMIL Boston, it should be possible to say <text href="xptr(pointer to elsewhere in the file)"> shouldn't it? -- Chris -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell Street, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia (I've moved!)
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 1999 09:37:19 UTC