- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:26:34 -0500
- To: "'Robert Neff'" <robneff@home.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
If there is "content" in the clip (EITHER video or audio), then by not having alternate media available (of which a transcript is the easiest and most obvious) you have shut out either the blind or the deaf. This is a P1 violation! How could it be otherwise? On Monday, December 20, 1999 10:39 PM, Robert Neff [SMTP:robneff@home.com] wrote: > from an implementation standpoint, what does everyone think about having > text transcripts as P2 for a video clip and synchronized captions P3?
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 1999 13:28:22 UTC