- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 17:15:52 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19991214171520.00a2e430@localhost>
>Subject: Fwd: Dumbing Down Article > >Had not heard of graceful transformation referred to as "dumbing down" >before. Kind of a scary article if this is how other web designers are >approaching the topic. > >-Ben > > > >>DUMBING DOWN >><file:///C:/My%20Documents/corp_who.htm#jeff>Jeffrey Allan >>I was recently reading an article about broadband Internet access and how >>many consumers balk at utilizing these services that currently exist due >>to the fact that the content which is currently on the Internet really >>doesn't require much more than the standard 56.6K modem that the normal >>home PC comes equipped with. >> >>This article actually brought something else to light for me that was in >>contrast with the actual topic of it, which was the "dumbing down" of >>content so that it can be accessed easier by mobile professionals over >>WAP enabled devices such as PDA's and cell phones. Dumbing down of course >>is the process of making Internet sites that are as compatible as >>possible across all devices, whether they be standard PC's, PDA's, or >>services like WebTV. It was also especially relevant given the fact that >>our South East Asia edition recently ran a review on Nokia's new 7110 >>model cell phone which allows users to surf the Web using just the >>standard display on the phone itself. This is different than previously >>models of cell phones, like Nokia's 9110, which could only retrieve >>e-mail and used a pseudo PDA type interface contained inside of the >>phone's casing. >> >>As a Web developer, when I'm developing a site, I most often think about >>how I can incorporate the most cutting-edge and latest technologies, such >>as dHTML and assorted plug-ins, but have never really stopped to consider >>the large group of users who may wish to access one of my sites using >>something other than MSIE 5.0 or the latest offering out of Netscape. >>What will these people see? How many of my users come from this >>demographic and how will incorporating good design techniques that allow >>all-around access affect my site's traffic? Maybe the most basic question >>I could pose would be "Should we be developing the most innovative >>technology or sites that are accessible by the largest potential audience?". >> >>When it comes down to it, this is quite a controversial issue. On the one >>side, you've got users who invest a lot of money in software and hardware >>that is able to utilize the very latest and greatest in Web technologies, >>and want to see their money put to good use. Should we punish them by >>developing very basic sites that in effect bring us back to the days of >>the pre-1996 Internet? On the other hand, should be exclude users who >>either choose not to, or cannot for practical reasons use a full-featured >>PC to view the sites we create? There's a very fine line between catering >>to loyal users and alienating potential new users, so we must stride it >>carefully. >> >>One of the first things we must take into account when making these >>primary design decisions is what exactly the function of our site is. Do >>we serve up mainly written content, or are we a site that is focused on >>rich multimedia technologies? In the case of the latter, it is probably >>advisable to utilize a more text-based approach, keeping graphics and >>multimedia to a minimum (for example Cyber Aspect's own format). The >>visitors who are coming to sites of this type are here mainly for >>informational purposes and not a lot of bells and whistles in design. To >>go overboard in the visuals is only going to serve to slow them down, and >>also limit the amount of content you can effectively place into a single >>page of the site. Now, on the flip-side, if you have a site that is >>mainly geared towards delivering examples of vector graphics animation, >>it goes without saying that a text-based approach isn't going to work too >>successfully. Trying to describe a multimedia concept without actually >>showing one is like to trying to describe a sunset to a person who's >>never seen one. A picture is worth a thousand words as the adage goes, >>but the key is in deciding when a picture is the right tool for the job. >> >>When you have this decided, then you're already 90% ready to create a >>site which best suites the needs of your potential audience. The main >>after thoughts that you need to deal with at this point are going to be >>with what alternatives you can offer to users who are not using the >>expected delivery platform. When reaching the largest possible audience >>is your ultimate goal, then the only real alternative is to create a >>multi-version site that allows users to choose what version best fits >>their needs. Just how far you go in creating multiple versions will again >>depend on the content you are presenting. If you again for example are >>dealing mainly with presenting multimedia technologies, then you can >>probably safely assume that many users who utilize WAP enable systems are >>not going to have much interest in a site of this type. Why? Well, the >>fact that they're using a WAP system in itself goes to show that they are >>not from the design or multimedia crowd, but more likely from the >>business and mobile exec crowd. Their orientation is more likely to be >>towards checking stock quotes or news headlines, not downloading MP3 >>files for immediate playback. >> >>In short, your greatest asset when deciding whether to go high-tech or >>dumbed down when creating an Internet presence is common sense. When >>you've put this into the light of your likely user demographic, then you >>can basically see how much effort you're going to need to put in, as well >>as what basic approach best suites the site overall. >> >>---------- >><http://www.cyber-aspect.com/>5a6bba.jpg >>>Cyber Aspect - >>><http://www.cyber-aspect.com/>http://www.cyber-aspect.com/ , to help >>>generate even more traffic and to encourage us in our efforts to be one >>>of the best online publishing groups, we ask every web site owner out >>>there, to link to the Cyber Aspect web site. >>> >>>
-- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: 5a6bba.jpg
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 1999 17:07:47 UTC