- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:18:15 -0800 (PST)
- To: charles@w3.org, phoenixl@netcom.com
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, Charles The problem is that user style sheets do not understand concepts / subject material. The combination of knowledge of subject material and of user can significantly affect layout. For example, results from seach engines often have links for next page of search results and previous page of search results. These links are usually at the end of the search results. However, for a blind user the better solution is to have these links at the top of the page so the blind user doesn't have to read though the search results. An even better solution for blind users is to tie the links to a keys so that the blind user can jump to the next page of results no matter where he/she is on the page. The user style sheet will not understand the purpose of these links. I've put up some examples of how information is presented on web pages in visual forms. The URL is: http://members.aol.com/criptrip/dynamic_web_pages/demo.html Take a look at them. How would user style sheets display them in a way easier to use for blind people? Something to remember is that dynamically generating web pages in different formats for different types of users does not prevent user style sheets from being used. The over all combination user-specific dynamically generated web pages in combination with user style sheets results in web pages even better presented for the user. Scott > Yes, it does matter. The C in CSS stands for Cascading, that is, there is an > ability for the presentation ideas of the author and the user to interact to > provide the best blend - the author knew the material best, the user knows > their requirements best. > > A system that does not support that potential for input from both sides, and > "negotiation" is generally poorer than one which does (assuming in each case > that they are well-implemented). > > Charles
Received on Thursday, 25 November 1999 12:18:21 UTC