- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 06:30:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi Scott, What I mean by template and database design is probably what you mean by dynamically generated - typicaly there is some kind of template (created as a page in systems like cold fusion or php/mySQL scripting, created in code on the fly by older-style CGI applications) or set of templates that are populated on the fly by the server. With regard to the user deciding what is relevant, I am assuming that a given page would contain the same information regardless of who it is being presented to. However the information might be available in graphic format, as well as in a movie and in plain text. If the user cannot see, they may choose to take the text, the descritions and audio from teh movie, and skip the rest because it is not relevant (to them). I am also assuming that the mechanism for navigating the site works in essentially the same way for all users - that is, that the same set of choices will lead to the same content. cheers Charles On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Scott Luebking wrote: Hi, Charles The template database approach works with limited templates and context. However, for example, a web site lets each user set up a profile describing how each web page should be configured for him. If the web site works with hundres and pages and thousands of users, the template and database approach is not reasonable. Actually, the appropriate design does not necessarily significantly increase the complexity. Give me an example and I probably have a way for it not to be that complex. (I hope <smile>.) I don't understand your statement "that in general creating different versions of a page sometimes overcome some implementation-specific limitations". How would a user decide what is relevant? (This goes back to the concept-barrier issues.) Scott
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 1999 06:30:40 UTC