- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:23:39 +1100 (EST)
- To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I concur entirely with the arguments that Charles has been so capably developing on this subject. If the user of an electronic document is to have the utmost flexibility in transforming it according to her or his specific needs, then several requirements need to be met. These include the preservation of relevant structural and semantic distinctions, thereby enabling appropriate conventions to be employed in the target medium as representing what would, in the visual context be conveyed by layout and presentational conventions. The same conditions are a prerequisite to interactive browsing and navigation. It would be a retrograde step to advocate an approach which, by tayloring content on the server side, attempts to prejudge the user's needs (or range of potential needs from which a choice is offered), and in so doing, distributes the document in a form which is inherently presentational rather than semantically rich. While I agree that a substantial proportion of web content today falls short of the stated goals, the best solution is to move technology and practice forward so as to facilitate the generation of broadly accessible, flexible, convertible content that conveys suitable semantic and structural properties than to transfer control (and hence assumptions as to users' needs) to the server, in other words to the content creator. This is not to minimise the importance of proxy services, or specialised server applications that may be needed when transmitting documents to handheld or other devices in which the available computing resources are limited. Server-side content generation is an invaluable, indeed fundamental technique underlying the web today, and as such it must be fully supported and developed. What I object to is the use of such technology to transform content in accordance with the needs of particular classes of users, particularly where the latter are identified in terms of disability.
Received on Monday, 22 November 1999 22:24:15 UTC