- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:20:05 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-pf@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, connolly@w3.org
This sounds good to me. Charles On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Al Gilman wrote: A question has been raised as to what sort of a resource can be cited in the URI-reference which is the value of a LONGDESC attribute. Should the XHTML specification, for example, add language addressing allowed or disallowed content types for resources so referenced? Comments from GL and PF are requested at this time to inform the WAI position taken before the HyperText Coordination Group. Proposed resolution: The content which results when the resource identified in a LONGDESC attribute is recovered is subject to the provisions of the WCAG 1.0 together with the referring document. This is how the obvious suitability-for-use concerns should be addressed, and not through any clause in the specification of the referring format restricting the content type of the resource served under the cited URI.
Received on Wednesday, 25 August 1999 19:20:06 UTC