- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1999 06:37:07 -0700
- To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- CC: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
JW:: "I will be persuaded not only by the most compelling arguments but also by those which are best supported within the research community." WL: As long as you don't become a "slave to fashion" this might be a sound approach. The history of "scientific" research, particularly in the fields under discussion, is replete with a long series of successful efforts to debunk earlier "best supported within the research community" positions. Just as there was little sympathy within the blind community for "rehab agency" approaches to counter-productive measures seeking inclusion, the current attempts to determine who "knows what's best" for people with cognitive/learning anomalies are characterized by attitudes typified by pejorative usages: "retard", "stupid", and even "illiterate". JW:: "Since people with cognitive disabilities may be less well placed to represent their own needs and advocate their own preferred approaches within the context of guideline development, than are other relevant parties, the opinions of specialists are likely to assume greater significance..." WL: Of course this signifies much of the previous attitudes as well as the present one. The deaf community has a little different perspective on Alexander Graham Bell than those of us with cell phones growing out of our ears and the widely held theory among the "research community" was that deafness was inextricably intertwined with reduced mental capacity, hence "deaf and dumb" - wherein dumb came to mean more than just "mute". Although this is a very difficult matter for those of us who are addicted to text, we must attend to the preferences of the affected population - and be very selective about "authority". It's not that we must proceed without attending to theoretical matters, just that we must keep our eye on the doughnut rather than the hole. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Sunday, 1 August 1999 09:37:05 UTC